In this sermon I left some questions unanswered so that those listening would be free to come to their own conclusions. – The Gospel reading was John 20. 19-31
On Friday, many of us watched the Royal Wedding (of Prince William and Catherine Middleton) in Westminster Abbey.
Here, surely, was the Church of England at its most splendid – providing the focus for a national celebration, watched by millions of people all over the world; cooperating with the state and the crown in moving pomp and ceremony; engaging effectively with the good and the great. – Here was carefully planned liturgy, well executed in a wonderfully decorated church, with fine music excellently performed. – Here was a bishop offering public advice to those in line for the throne on how to conduct their lives and their marriage. – And the clergy were as impressively dressed as everyone else! (The sermon, preached by the Bishop of London, can be read here )
But how much of this would have been recognized by the risen Jesus as part of his vision, when he sent his followers in to the world to make disciples of all nations? How close or far away is this from what Jesus had in mind?
Well, in today’s Gospel we hear a story of the risen Jesus appearing to his disciples on the evening of the first Easter Day and apparently commissioning them for their future task. He breathes on them and says “Receive the Holy Spirit. – If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” – Jesus is commissioning his disciples and he seems to be entrusting them with a clear and specific authority – and the Church has often read these words in that way – as Jesus commissioning, not only his first disciples, but also their successors, his Bishops and his clergy, not only to forgive sins but also to make decisions about what needs to be forgiven and even, perhaps, about what may be unforgivable – authority to give guidance about what is right and what is wrong.
However, it is interesting to compare these words of Jesus in John’s Gospel with the corresponding story in Luke’s Gospel (Luke 24. 36-48) where the risen Jesus also appears to his disciples on the evening of the first Easter Day and also gives them a commission. –In both Gospels Jesus begins with a greeting of peace, but in Luke’s Gospel the words he uses for the commission are rather different. According to Luke Jesus speaks of a message of repentance and the forgiveness of sins which is to be proclaimed in all nations and of which the disciples are to be witnesses.
John’s version of the words of Jesus may be read as the bestowing of authority on the disciples, giving them the power and prerogative to forgive sins – or possibly not to forgive them. – Whereas Luke’s version of what Jesus says sounds more like a commissioning of the disciples to a way of life characterised by repentance and forgiveness – characteristics which they are to show forth and witness by their own lives to people in all the world.
I wonder which of these alternatives do you think is closer to what Jesus had in mind!
Famously, though, there was one disciple, Thomas, who was not present when Jesus appeared to his disciples on this occasion. And when the other disciples tell Thomas what has happened he expresses doubt. – Usually his doubts are taken to be doubts about the resurrection itself, but perhaps Thomas is also doubtful about the claim of the disciples to have been given the kind of authority suggested in John’s Gospel.
At any rate, Thomas requires authentication in order to believe. – And whatever it is that the other disciples tell him has happened, or claim that Jesus said, is not sufficient authentication in Thomas’s view.
It is interesting to think about someone you know well and to consider what it is about them that most characterises who they are. – What is the one thing about them that you would still expect to recognise if everything else had changed? – Or if, perhaps, you hadn’t seen them for a long time what would be the one thing that would reassure you that this is the still the same person? – Would it be something about the way they speak, their attitude, the way they might greet you or the look in their eye? – Well of course it would be different for each person.
So what, then, is most characteristic of Jesus? What would you expect to remain the same even though everything else about him might seem to have changed? – Would it be his ability to perform miracles? Or the authority with which he speaks? Or the challenge he puts before the scribes and Pharisees of this world? What do you feel is most characteristic about Jesus?
Well, what Thomas wants to see and to touch are the wounds of Jesus. – These wounds, he considers, will provide the best authentication that this, truly, is Jesus risen from the dead.
Now of course the nail marks in Jesus hands and the spear wound in his side were only recently inflicted on his body – but they do speak of something deep in his character. – Jesus is wounded like this because of the way he indentified with others who themselves were wounded; – with the untouchable leper and social outcast whom Jesus touched and embraced and welcomed; with the chronically sick who, after waiting long, yearned to be healed, even though it was the Sabbath day; with the insane person condemned to a life among the tombs; with women bent double by their heavy burden or ostracized because of physical illness; with all those considered unclean and impure because of the job they did or because, like the Samaritans, they chose a different interpretation of the faith; and with anyone who might be labeled as a sinner.
It is because of Jesus identification with each of these people, in preference to the representatives of established official religion, that he was wounded; and it is through them that he identifies, in his death, with all the wounded of the world. – And, so far as Thomas is concerned, it is these wounds of Jesus that will most clearly identify him. It is in and through these wounds that Jesus will be recognized, even though everything else about him might seem to be different. – And without these wounds he would not be the same Jesus.
So I wonder how it seems to you. What do you consider to be most characteristic of Jesus? Has it to do with his wounds, or with the way of forgiveness that he taught, or is it something else?
I conclude with a poem by Kate Mcilhagga (published in 1995) addressed to the Thomas who waits to reach out and touch the wounds of Jesus.
Put you hand, Thomas,
on the crawling head of a child
imprisoned in a cot in Romania.
Place your finger, Thomas,
on the list of those
who have disappeared in Chile.
Stroke the cheek, Thomas,
of the little girl
sold into prostitution in Thailand.
Touch, Thomas,
the gaping wounds of my world.
Feel, Thomas,
the primal wound of my people.
Reach out your hands, Thomas,
and place them at the side of the poor.
Grasp my hand, Thomas,
and believe,
when you feel me in the world’s pain
and in the world’s glory.
(This poem was originally included in “Human Rites: Worship Resources for an Age of Change. Published in London by Mowbray. 1995)